Liu, Y. & Feng, C. What drives the fluctuations of “green” productivity in China’s agricultural sector? A weighted Russell directional distance approach. Resourc. Conserv. Recycl. 147, 201–213 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ma, J. & Huang, K. Examining the factors influencing agricultural surface source pollution in the Yangtze River economic zone from the perspectives of government, enterprise, and agriculture. Sustainability 15, 14753 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kassie, M., Jaleta, M., Shiferaw, B. A., Mmbando, F. E. & Mekuria, M. Adoption of interrelated sustainable agricultural practices in smallholder systems: Evidence from rural Tanzania. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 80, 525–540 (2013).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. An evaluation of China’s agricultural green production: 1978–2017. J. Clean. Product. 243, 118483 (2020).
Google Scholar
Li, F. et al. Driving mechanism for farmers to adopt improved agricultural systems in China: The case of rice-green manure crops rotation system. Agric. Syst. 192, 103202 (2021).
Google Scholar
Shah, K. K. et al. Diversified crop rotation: An Approach for sustainable agriculture production. Adv. Agric. 2021, 1–9 (2021).
Google Scholar
Durán-Lara, E. F., Valderrama, A. & Marican, A. Natural organic compounds for Application in organic farming. Agriculture 10(2), 41 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. & Liu, Z. An empirical analysis of the impact of brand story themes on brand attitude in the context of B2C E-commerce platforms for organic agricultural products. Sustainability 15, 16679 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ruiz Corrêa, S. T. et al. straw removal effects on soil water dynamics, soil temperature, and sugarcane yield in South-Central Brazil. BioEnergy Res. 1, 1–15 (2019).
Yang, C.-Q. et al. Barley straw combined with urea and controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer improves lint yield and nitrogen utilization of field-seeded cotton. Agronomy 12(5), 1208 (2022).
Google Scholar
Li, M., Wang, J., Zhao, P., Chen, K. & Wu, L. Factors affecting the willingness of agricultural green production from the perspective of farmers’ perceptions. Sci. Total Environ. 738, 140289. (2020).
Google Scholar
Zheng, H., Ma, J., Yao, Z. & Hu, F. How does social embeddedness affect farmers’ adoption behavior of low-carbon agricultural technology? Evidence from Jiangsu province, China. Front. Environ. Sci. 10, 909803 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. & Li, Q. The influence of new media technology on educational communication in China. in DEStech Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering (2017).
McKay, T. R., Steede, G. M. & Swenson, R. Expanding the agricultural educator’s toolkit: Identifying challenges in digital media production technology. J. Agric. Educ. 63(4), 59–77 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, L. Research on the operation and development mode of family farm in the new media era. Educ. Reform Dev. 2, 2 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shen, J. et al. Agriculture green development: A model for China and the world. Front. Agric. Sci. Eng. 7, 5–13 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhang, F., Wang, F., Hao, R. & Wu, L. Agricultural science and technology innovation, spatial spillover and agricultural green development: Taking 30 provinces in China as the research object. Appl. Sci. 12, 845 (2022).
Google Scholar
Sharma, M., Sridhar, K., Gupta, V. K. & Dikkala, P. K. Greener technologies in agri-food wastes valorization for plant pigments: Step towards circular economy. Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 5, 100340 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mishra, S. Emerging technologies: Principles and applications in precision agriculture. in Data Science in Agriculture and Natural Resource Management, 31–53 (2021).
Ahmad, F., Khaliq, A., Qiu, B., Sultan, M. & Ma, J. Advancements of spraying technology in agriculture. Technol. Agric. 33, 1–10 (2021).
Zhang, X. & Chen, H. Green agricultural development based on information communication technology and the panel space measurement model. Sustainability 13, 1147 (2021).
Google Scholar
Roiss, O. & Medvedeva, L. Innovation in agriculture-An actor in the development of a green economy. in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2650 (2022).
Xie, D. & Gao, W. Low-carbon transformation of China’s smallholder agriculture: Exploring the role of farmland size expansion and green technology adoption. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 30, 105522–105537. (2023).
Google Scholar
Tian, L., Zheng, S. & Chen, R. Study on the factors influencing the adoption of green prevention and control technology and income effect: An empirical analysis based on survey data of 792 vegetable farmers. Chin. J. Ecol. Agric. 30, 1687–1697 (2022).
Ren, J., Lei, H. & Ren, H. Livelihood capital, ecological cognition, and farmers’ green production behavior. Sustainability 14, 16671 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kassem, H. S., Shabana, R. M., Ghoneim, Y. A. & Alotaibi, B. M. Farmers’ perception of the quality of mobile-based extension services in Egypt: A comparison between public and private provision. Inf. Dev. 36, 161–180. (2020).
Google Scholar
Guo, H. et al. Driving mechanism of farmers’ utilization behaviors of straw resources: An empirical study in Jilin Province, the main grain producing region in the northeast part of China. Sustainability 13(5), 2506 (2021).
Google Scholar
Elahi, E., Khalid, Z. & Zhang, Z. Understanding farmers’ intention and willingness to install renewable energy technology: A solution to reduce the environmental emissions of agriculture. Appl. Energy 309, 118459 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mao, H., Zhou, L., Ying, R. & Pan, D. Time Preferences and green agricultural technology adoption: Field evidence from rice farmers in China. Land Use Policy 109, 105627 (2021).
Google Scholar
McCarthy, B., Liu, H. & Chen, T. Innovations in the agro-food system: Adoption of certified organic food and green food by Chinese consumers. Br. Food J. 118, 1334–1349 (2016).
Google Scholar
Liu, X. et al. Identifying worldwide interests in organic foods by google search engine data. IEEE Access 7, 147771–147781. (2019).
Google Scholar
Gao, Y., Zhao, D., Yu, L. & Yang, H. Influence of a new agricultural technology extension mode on farmers’ technology adoption behavior in China. J. Rural Stud. 76, 173–183. (2020).
Google Scholar
Huang, X., Yang, F. & Fahad, S. The impact of digital technology use on farmers’ low-carbon production behavior under the background of carbon emission peak and carbon neutrality goals. Front. Environ. Sci. (2022).
Google Scholar
Iqbal, M. A. et al. Drivers of farm households’ perceived risk sources and factors affecting uptake of mitigation strategies in Punjab Pakistan: Implications for Sustainable agriculture. Sustainability 12(23), 9895 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lane, D. et al. Climate change and agriculture in New York and Pennsylvania: Risk perceptions, vulnerability and adaptation among farmers. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 33, 197–205 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y.-J., Wang, N. & Huang, G. Q. How do rural households accept straw returning in Northeast China?. Resourc. Conserv. Recycl. 182, 106287. (2022).
Google Scholar
Dai, Q. & Cheng, K. What drives the adoption of agricultural green production technologies? An extension of TAM in agriculture. Sustainability 14, 14457. (2022).
Google Scholar
Ren, Z. & Zhong, K. Driving mechanism of subjective cognition on farmers’ adoption behavior of straw returning technology: Evidence from rice and wheat producing provinces in China. Front. Psychol. (2022).
Google Scholar
Li, C., Shi, Y., Khan, S. U. & Zhao, M. Research on the impact of agricultural green production on farmers’ technical efficiency: Evidence from China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 28, 38535–38551. (2021).
Google Scholar
Sui, Y. & Gao, Q. Farmers’ endowments, technology perception and green production technology adoption behavior. Sustainability 15, 7385. (2023).
Google Scholar
Yazdanpanah, M., Hayati, D., Hochrainer-Stigler, S. & Zamani, G. Understanding farmers’ intention and behavior regarding water conservation in the Middle-East and North Africa: A case study in Iran. J. Environ. Manag. 135, 63–72 (2014).
Google Scholar
Caffaro, F., Micheletti Cremasco, M., Roccato, M. & Cavallo, E. Drivers of farmers’ intention to adopt technological innovations in Italy: The role of information sources, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use. J. Rural Stud. 76, 264–271 (2020).
Google Scholar
Jiang, W., Yan, T. & Chen, B. Impact of media channels and social interactions on the adoption of straw return by Chinese farmers. Sci. Total Environ. 756, 144078. (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhao, Q., Pan, Y. & Xia, X. Internet can do help in the reduction of pesticide use by farmers: Evidence from rural China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 2063–2073. (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Ali, S., Akbar, A. & Rasool, F. Determining the influencing factors of biogas technology adoption intention in Pakistan: The moderating role of social media. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 2311. (2020).
Google Scholar
Bilali, H. E. & Allahyari, M. S. Transition towards sustainability in agriculture and food systems: Role of information and communication technologies. Inf. Process. Agric. 5(4), 456–464 (2018).
Davis, F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–340. (1989).
Google Scholar
Vasudeva, S. Age in the acceptance of mobile social media: A comparison of generation Y and baby boomers using UTAUT2 model. Int. J. E-Adopt. (IJEA) 15, 1–24. (2023).
Google Scholar
Yao, Y. & Murphy, L. Remote electronic voting systems: An exploration of voters’ perceptions and intention to use. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 16, 106–120. (2007).
Google Scholar
Chen, L.-D., Gillenson, M. L. & Sherrell, D. L. Enticing online consumers: An extended technology acceptance perspective. Inf. Manag. 39, 705–719. (2002).
Google Scholar
Anderson, C. S., Al-Gahtani, S. & Hubona, G. The value of TAM antecedents in global IS development and research. J. Org. End User Comput. (JOEUC) 23, 18–37. (2011).
Google Scholar
Fichman, R. G. Information technology diffusion: A review of empirical research. ICIS. 195, 206 (1992).
Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychol. Health. 26(9), 1113–1127 (2011).
Google Scholar
Kamal, S. A., Shafiq, M. I., Shafiq, M. I. & Kakria, P. Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Technol. Soc. 60, 101212 (2020).
Google Scholar
Alfadda, H. A. & Mahdi, H. S. Measuring students’ use of zoom application in language course based on the technology acceptance model (TAM). J. Psycholing. Res. 50, 883–900 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E. & Straub, D. W. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Q. 27, 51–90 (2003).
Google Scholar
Aubert, B., Schroeder, A. & Grimaudo, J. IT as enabler of sustainable farming: An empirical analysis of farmers’ adoption decision of precision agriculture technology. Decis. Support Syst. 54, 510–520 (2012).
Google Scholar
Savari, M., Zhoolideh, M. & Khosravipour, B. Explaining pro-environmental behavior of farmers: A case of rural Iran. Curr. Psychol. 42, 7752–7770 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dong, H., Wang, H. & Han, J. Understanding ecological agricultural technology adoption in China using an integrated technology acceptance model: Theory of planned behavior model. Front. Environ. Sci. 10, 927668 (2022).
Google Scholar
Xu, J. et al. Exploring optimal irrigation and nitrogen fertilization in a winter wheat-summer maize rotation system for improving crop yield and reducing water and nitrogen leaching. Agric. Water Manag. 228, 105904 (2020).
Google Scholar
Giacometti, C. et al. Rotation and fertilization effects on soil quality and yields in a long term field experiment. Agronomy 11(4), 636 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pavlou, P. A. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Electron. Commerce 7, 101–134 (2003).
Google Scholar
Asravor, R. K. Farmers’ risk preference and the adoption of risk management strategies in Northern Ghana. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 62, 881–900 (2018).
Google Scholar
Shee, A., Azzarri, C. & Haile, B. Farmers’ willingness to pay for improved agricultural technologies: Evidence from a field experiment in Tanzania. Sustainability 12, 216 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhou, W., Qing, C., Deng, X., Song, J. & Xu, D. How does Internet use affect farmers’ low-carbon agricultural technologies in southern China?. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 16476–16487. (2022).
Google Scholar
Smith, A., Goe, W. R., Kenney, M. & Paul, C. J. M. Computer and internet use by great plains farmers. J. Agric. Resourc. Econ. 1, 481–500 (2004).
Cole, S. & Fernando, A. N. The value of advice: Evidence from mobile phone-based agricultural extension. in Harvard Business School Working Paper. 13, 047 (2012).
Maredia, M. K. et al. Can mobile phone-based animated videos induce learning and technology adoption among low-literate farmers? A field experiment in Burkina Faso. Inf. Technol. Dev. 24, 429–460. (2017).
Google Scholar
Leng, X. & Tong, G. J. The digital economy empowers the sustainable development of China’s agriculture-related industries. Sustainability 14(17), 10967 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chaffey, D., Ellis-Chadwick, F., Mayer, R. & Johnston, K. Internet Marketing: Strategy, Implementation and Practice (Pearson Education, 2009).
Juswadi, J., Sumarna, P. & Mulyati, N. S. in International Conference on Agriculture, Social Sciences, Education, Technology and Health (ICASSETH 2019). 105–110 (Atlantis Press).
Zeng, B., Liu, X., Zhang, W., Wu, L. & Xu, D. Digital transformation of agricultural products purchasing: From the perspective of short videos live-streaming. Sustainability 15, 14948 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lu, H., Hu, L., Zheng, W., Yao, S. & Qian, L. Impact of household land endowment and environmental cognition on the willingness to implement straw incorporation in China. J. Clean. Prod. 262, 121479 (2020).
Google Scholar
Cheruku, D. J. K. & Katekar, V. Harnessing digital agriculture technologies for sustainable agriculture in India: Opportunities and challenges. in Administrative Development ‘A Journal of HIPA, Shimla’ (2021).
Xiang, W. & Gao, J. Do not be anticlimactic: Farmers’ behavior in the sustainable application of green agricultural technology: A perceived value and government support perspective. Agriculture 13, 247. (2023).
Google Scholar
Xinyu, T., Yanqin, C. & Jiayu, Y. The impact of digital technology on farmers’ adoption of low-carbon agricultural technology behavior-based on the theory of planned behavior [Chinese]. Rural Sci. Technol. 14, 4–9 (2023).
Bagheri, A., Bondori, A., Allahyari, M. S. & Damalas, C. A. Modeling farmers’ intention to use pesticides: An expanded version of the theory of planned behavior. J. Environ. Manag. 248, 109291 (2019).
Google Scholar
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39–50 (1981).
Google Scholar
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol. Res. Online 8, 23–74 (2003).
Rahayuningsih, S. D. & Tain, A. Consumers willingness to pay and factors affecting organic vegetable purchasing decisions. Agriecobis J. Agric. Socioecon. Bus. 4(1), 01–12 (2021).
Guntukogula Pattabhi, S., Prashanth, P., Sreenivasulu, M. & Madavilata, A. Effectiveness of social media agricultural information on farmer’s knowledge. Environ. Conserv. J. 24, 123–129 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bello-Bravo, J. et al. Scientific animations without borders SM: an international collaborative approach for building scientific educational materials for use on cell phones and the internet in developing nations. Int. J. Sci. Soc. 2, 4 (2011).
Google Scholar
link