• Wed. Mar 26th, 2025

The impact of ethical commitments on the intention to adopt digital agricultural technologies

The impact of ethical commitments on the intention to adopt digital agricultural technologies
  • Adeniyi, D. A. & Dinbabo, M. F. Factors influencing household food security among irrigation smallholders in North West Nigeria. J. Rev. Glob. Econ. 8, 291–304. (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie-O’Malley, A., Bronson, K., van der Burg, S. & Klerkx, L. The future(s) of digital agriculture and sustainable food systems: An analysis of high-level policy documents. Ecosyst. Serv. 45, 1–13. (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Paslakis, G., Dimitropoulos, G. & Katzman, D. K. A call to action to address COVID-19–induced global food insecurity to prevent hunger, malnutrition, and eating pathology. Nutr. Rev. 79, 114–116 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Misselhorn, A. et al. A vision for attaining food security. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 4, 7–17. (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. Poverty and Equity Database. (2020).

  • Campos, A., Villani, C., Davis, B. & Takagi, M. Ending extreme poverty in rural areas – Sustaining livelihoods to leave no one behind. FAO (2018).

  • Bai, J., Seale, J.L., J. R. & Wahl, T. I. Meat demands in China: to include or not to include meat away from home? Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 64, 150–170. (2020).

  • Motaghi, M. & Shabanali Fami, H. The Role of nutrition-sensitive agriculture in food security and nutrition. Sci. Prom. Q. 23, 252–269. (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zobeidi, T., Yazdanpanah, M., Komendantova, N., Sieber, S. & Lohr, K. Factors affecting smallholder farmers’ technical and non-technical adaptation responses to drought in Iran. J. Environ. Manag. 298, 113552. (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellon Maurel, V., Brossard, L., Garcia, F., Mitton, N. & Termier, A. Agriculture and digital technology: Getting the most out of digital technology to contribute to thetransition to sustainable agriculture and food systems. 1–185. (2022).

  • Gumbi, N., Gumbi, L. & Twinomurinzi, H. Towards sustainable digital agriculture for smallholder farmers: A systematic literature review. Sustainability 15, 12530. (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasundram, S. K., Shamshiri, R. R., Sridhara, S. & Rizan, N. The role of digital agriculture in mitigating climate change and ensuring food security: An overview. Sustainability 15, 1–23. (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bontsa, N. V., Mushunje, A. & Ngarava, S. Factors influencing the perceptions of smallholder farmers towards adoption of digital technologies in eastern cape province, South Africa. Agriculture 13, 1–16. (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Burg, S., Bogaardt, M. J. & Wolfert, S. Ethics of smart farming: Current questions and directions for responsible innovation towards the future. NJAS Wageningen J. Life Sci. 90–91, 100289. (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, J., Ramankutty, N. & Brauman, K. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337–342 (2011).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, M., Turner, J., Small, B. & Wheeler, D. Priorities for science to overcome hurdles thwarting the full promise of the ‘digital agriculture’ revolution. J. Sci. Food Agric. 100, 5083–5092. (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Soma, T. & Nuckchady, B. Communicating the benefits and risks of digital agriculture technologies: Perspectives on the future of digital agricultural education and training. Orig. Res. 6, 1–17. (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C. & Bogaardt, M. Big data in smart farming–a review. Agric. Syst. 153, 69–80. (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Weersink, A., Fraser, E., Pannell, D., Duncan, E. & Rotz, S. Opportunities and challenges for big data in agricultural and environmental analysis. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 10, 19–37. (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Basso, B. & Antle, J. Digital agriculture to design sustainable agricultural systems. Nat. Sustain. 3, 254–256. (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. FAO’s Work on Agricultural Innovation: Sowing the seeds of transformation to achieve the SDGs. Rome (2018).

  • FAO. Nutrition-sensitive agriculture and food systems in practice options for intervention. (2017).

  • Rose, D. & Chilvers, J. Agriculture 4.0: Broadening responsible innovation in an era of smart farming. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Atanga, S.N. Digitalization of Agriculture: How digital technology is transforming small-scale farming in Ghana [Masters]. International Institute of Social Studies. (2020).

  • Newell, P. & Taylor, O. Contested landscapes: The global political economy of climate-smart agriculture. J. Peasant Stud. 45, 108–129. (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdulai, A. R. Toward digitalization futures in smallholder farming systems in Sub-Sahara Africa: A social practice proposal. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. P., Kuhn-Sherlock, B., Dela Rue, B. T. & Eastwood, C. R. Short communication: Technologies and milking practices that reduce hours of work and increase flexibility through milking efficiency in pasture-based dairy farm systems. J. Dairy Sci. 103, 7172–7179. (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Colussi, J., Morgan, E. L., Schnitkey, G. D. & Padula, A. D. How Communication affects the adoption of digital technologies in soybean production: A survey in Brazil. Agriculture 12, 611. (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Savari, M. & Noushad, M. Factors influencing the improvement of food security in rural households: A case study of Hendijan county. Agric. Prod. Market. Econ. J. 1, 41–54 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabi Besharabadi, H. & Ouhadi, A. H. Investigating factors affecting food security in Iran. Agric. Econ. J. 8, 111–121 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jomani, D., Amini, A., Qader Morzi, H. & Tavakoli, J. Assessment of food security and exploring its challenges in rural areas: A case study of badr rural district, Ravansar county. J. Reg. Plan. 7, 87–102. (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Azadfar, M., Lashgarara, F., Farajollahi Hosseini, S. J., Omidinajafabadi, M. & Afshari, H. Identification and ranking of factors influencing food security improvement based on the role of nano technology. Agric. Extens. Educ. Res. J. 14, 1–16. (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaeifar, M., Khalilian, S. & Najafi Alamdarloo, H. Spatial distribution of food insecurity in urban and rural areas of Iran. Agric. Econ. J. 16, 99–121. (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2018. Building climate resilience for food security and nutrition. (FAO), Rome, Italy (2018).

  • Savari, M. A proposed model for sustainable food security in drought conditions in Kurdistan province. J. Environ. Hazards Anal. 9, 81–104 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Akati, M., Ahmadpour Borazjani, M. & Sarani, V. Identifying factors affecting food security in rural areas: A case study of zehak region in sistan and baluchestan province. J. Rural Dev. Strateg. 7, 199–209. (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Liu, G., Chen, Y. & Li, R. Study on the influence mechanism of adoption of smart agriculture technology behavior. Sci. Rep. 13, 1–13. (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdulai, A. R., Gibson, R. & Fraser, E. D. G. Beyond transformations: Zooming in on agricultural digitalization and the changing social practices of rural farming in Northern Ghana, West Africa. J. Rural Stud. 100, 1–10. (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolfe, E. L. et al. Precision and digital agriculture: Adoption of technologies and perception of Brazilian farmers. Agriculture 10, 653. (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pivoto, D. et al. Factors influencing the adoption of smart farming by Brazilian grain farmers. Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev. 72, 62–148. (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobryk, C. W., Yost, M. A. & Kitchen, N. R. Field variability and vulnerability index to identify regional precision agriculture opportunity. Precis. Agric. 19, 589–605. (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazdi-Samadi, B. Application of future technologies in ensuring food security in Iran and the world. Strateg. Res. Agric. Sci. Nat. Resour. 2, 15–28 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaei, M. & Zand, E. Transformation in the Agricultural Sector with a Smart Approach: Experiences of Asian APO Member Countries (Agricultural Extension and Education Institute. Agricultural Education Publication, 2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Forouzanfar, M. H. & Molahosseini, A. Designing ethics-based model for technology Acceptance in SMEs. J. Ethics Sci. Technol. 13, 57–63 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi, A. & Yaghobi, S. Technology acceptance model with emphasis on cultural conditions in Iran. Technol. Dev. Q. 24, 25–34 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagh Parast, R., Hedayatinia, S., Khosrawipour, B. & Ghanian, M. Structural equation for effective factors on ICT acceptance among graduate students in agriculture department of Ramin Ahwaz. Agric. Educ. Manag. Q. 29, 49–62 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahami, R. & Zarea, H. Factors affecting the acceptance of new technologies in remote education using the technology acceptance model (Case study: Payame noor university of Isfahan). New Approach Train. Manag. Q. 4, 67–80 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebrezgabher, S. A., Meuwissen, P. M., Kruseman, G., Lanker, D. & Lansink, A. G. Factors influencing adoption of manure separation technology in the Netherlands. J. Environ. Manag. 150, 1–8 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozbek, V., Alniacik, U., Koc, F., Akkilic, M. E. & Kas, E. The impact of personality on technology acceptance: A study on smart phone users. Procedia- Soc. Behav. Sci. 150, 541–551 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Turaga, R. M. R., Howarth, R. B. & Borsuk, M. E. Pro-environmental behavior. Ann. N. York Acad. Sci. 1185, 211–224. (2010).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. H., Liang, M. & Yang, W. Does digital financial inclusion reduce china’s rural household vulnerability to poverty: An empirical analysis from the perspective of household entrepreneurship?. SAGE Open (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptista, F. et al. Which are the best practices for MSc programmes in sustainable agriculture?. J. Clean. Prod. 303, 126914 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, E., Ely, A., Birkin, L., Basu, P. & Goulson, D. The contribution of small-scale food production in urban areas to the sustainable development goals: A review and case study. Sustain. Sci. (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Klockner, C. A. A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour. A meta-analysis. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1028–1038. (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, P., Staats, H. & Wilke, H. A. Situational and personality factors as direct or personal norm mediated predictors of pro-environmental behavior: Questions derived from norm-activation theory. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 29, 323–334. (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, J. I. M. & Steg, L. Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions. J. Environ. Psychol. 30, 368–378. (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Onwezen, M. C., Antonides, G. & Bartels, J. The norm activation model: An exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour. J. Econ. Psychol. 39, 141–153. (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Gifford, R. & Vlek, C. Factors influencing car use for commuting and the intention to reduce it: A question of self-interest or morality?. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 12, 317–324. (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, J. I. & Steg, L. Morality and prosocial behavior: The role of awareness, responsibility, and norms in the norm activation model. J. Soc. Psychol. 149, 425–449. (2009).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. & Ha, S. Understanding consumer recycling behavior: Combining the theory of planned behavior and the norm activation model. Fam. Consum. Sci. Res. J. 42, 278–291. (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazdanpanah, M. & Mardasi, Gh. R. Predicting the use of safety helmets among motorcycle farmers using psychological models in Shushtar County. Rural Res. Q. 8, 675–688. (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, H. The norm activation model and theory-broadening: Individuals’ decision-making on environmentally-responsible convention attendance. J. Environ. Psychol. 40, 462–471. (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Steg, L. & De Groot, J. Explaining prosocial intentions: Testing causal relationships in the norm activation model. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 49, 725–743. (2010).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Savari, M., Eskandari Damaneh, H., Eskandari Damaneh, H. & Cotton, M. Integrating the norm activation model and theory of planned behaviour to investigate farmer Pro-environmental behavioural intention. Sci. Rep. 13(5584), 1–14. (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi, S. Z., Mohammadzadeh, S. & Yazdanpanah, M. Predicting the factors affecting the behavior of palm farmers in the production cooperative of Dashtestan city in the field of water conservation by comparing the model of planned behavior and the norm-activating model. Coop. Agric. 28, 104–136 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamid, F., Yazdanpanah, M., Khalilmoghadam, B. & Azadi, H. Understanding the environmental behavior of farmers in Ramshir region regarding the application of nitrogen fertilizer and its influencing factors. J. Agric. Extens. Educ. Sci. Iran 1, 53–70. (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Klockner, C. A. & Blobaum, A. A comprehensive action determination model: Toward a broader understanding of ecological behaviour using the example of travel mode choice. J. Environ. Psychol. 4, 574–586. (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallis, J. F., Owen, N. & Fisher, E. Ecological models of health behavior. Health Behav. Theor. Res. Pract. 5, 43–64 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlimann, A., Dolnicar, S. & Meyer, P. Understanding behaviour to inform water supply management in developed nations–a review of literature, conceptual model and research agenda. J. Environ. Manag. 1, 47–56. (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller, M., Haustein, S. & Bohlbro, M. S. Adolescents’ associations between travel behaviour and environmental impact: A qualitative study based on the Norm-Activation Model. Travel Behav. Soc. 11, 69–77. (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F. G. & Scheuthle, H. Two challenges to a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior, Moral norms and just world beliefs in conservationism. Personal. Indiv. Diff. 5, 1033–1048. (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Montazeri, M. & Zamani, G. H. Developing an environmental behavior model for farmers in Shiraz province. Iran. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2, 63–75 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sentosa, I. & Mat, N. K. N. Examining a theory of planned behavior (TPB) and technology acceptance model (TAM) in internet purchasing using structural equation modeling. J. Arts Sci. Commerced 2, 62–77 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Braakhuis, J. Predicting pro environmental behavior. Master thesis, Utrecht University.

  • Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall (2016).

  • Davis, F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of informationtechnology. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 3, 319–340. (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Micheels, E. T. & Nolan, J. F. Examining the effects of absorptive capacity and social capital on the adoption of agriculturalinnovations: A canadian prairie case study. Agric. Syst. 145, 127–138. (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigg, K. E. & Crank, L. D. Building community social capital: The potential and promise of information and communications technologies. J. Community Inform. 1, 58–73. (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunecke, C., Engler, A., Jara-Rojas, R. & Poortvliet, P. M. Understanding the role of social capital in adoption decisions: An application to irrigation technology. Agric. Syst. 153, 221–231. (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rijn, F., Bulte, E. & Adekunle, A. Social capital and agricultural innovation in sub-saharan Africa. Agric. Syst. 108, 112–122. (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambrecht, I., Vanlauwe, B., Merckx, R. & Maertens, M. Understanding the process of agricultural technology adoption: Mineral fertilizer in eastern DR Congo. World Dev. 59, 132–146. (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelini, J. J. Small farmers and social capital in development projects: Lessons from failures in Argentina’s rural periphery. J. Rural. Stud 30, 99–109. (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanginga, P. C., Kamugisha, R. N. & Martin, A. M. Conflicts management, social capital and adoption of agroforestry technologies: Empirical findings from the highlands of southwestern Uganda. Agrofor. Syst. 69, 67–76. (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirwa, E. W. Adoption of fertiliser and hybrid seeds by smallholder maize farmers in Southern Malawi. Dev. South. Afr. 22, 1–12. (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Isham, J. The effect of social capital on fertiliser adoption: Evidence from rural Tanzania. J. Afr. Econ. 11, 39–60 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazdanpanah, M., Klein, K., Zobeidi, T., Sieber, S. & Lohr, K. Why have economic incentives failed to convince farmers to adopt drip irrigation in southwestern Iran?. Sustainability 14, 1–15. (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazdanpanah, M. et al. What factors contribute to conversion to organic farming? Consideration of the Health Belief Model in relation to the uptake of organic farming by Iranian farmers. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 65, 907–929. (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N., Sophoulis, C. M., Iosifides, T., Botetzagias, I. & Evangelinos, K. The influence of social capital on environmental policy instruments. Environ. Polit. 4, 595–611. (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Azadkhani, P., Hosseinzadeh, J. & Karami, F. Investigating the role of social capital in environmental protection in Ilam city. Environ. Sci. Technol. 9, 1–16. (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. L. The Influence of Social Class and Cultural Variables Sociology of Education (Greenwood Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorgi karsami, A., Radneya, H., Safari, R. & Asadi Rad, A. Investigate the relationship between social capital and citizen participation in environmental man-agement and urban health. The first conference national and urban and environmental services, Mashhad (2013).

  • Dizon, J. P. M., Enoch-Stevens, T. & Huerta, A. H. Carcerality and education: Toward a relational theory of risk in educational institutions. Am. Behav. Sci. 66, 1319–1341. (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahsan, D. A. & Roth, E. Farmers’ perceived risks and risk management strategies in an emerging mussel aquaculture industry in Denmark. Mar. Resour.Econ. 3, 309–323. (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Blesia, J. U., Iek, M., Ratang, W. & Hutajulu, H. Developing an entrepreneurship model to increase student’s entre-preneurial skills: An action research project in a higher education institution in Indonesia. Syst. Pract. Action Res. 34, 53–70. (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Z., Zhong, W. & Shumaila, N. Can environmental knowledge and risk perception make a difference? The role of environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior in fostering sustainable consumption behavior. Sustainability 15, 4791. (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazdanpanah, M., Hayati, D. & Zamani, G. H. Investigating agricultural professionals’intentions and behaviours towards water conservation: Using a modified theory of planned behaviour. Environ. Sci. 1, 1–22 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger, W. N. et al. Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change?. Clim. Change 3, 335–354. (2009).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, S. C. Communicating climate change: History, challenges, process and future directions. WIREs Clim. Change 1, 31–53. (2010).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghobadi Aliabadi, S., Agah, H. & Farhadian, H. Investigating the effective factors on farmers’ perception of climate change risk and the effect of these factors on their adaptive behaviors (The case of Kermanshah Township). J. Reg. Plan. 46, 333–347 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maqsoom, A. et al. Adopting green behaviors in the construction sector: The role of behavioral intention, motivation, and environmental consciousness. Buildings 13, 1–20. (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., Zhao, X., Li, H. & Zhang, Q. Will social capital affect farmers’ choices of climate change adaptation strategies? Evidences from rural households in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. J. Rural Stud. 83, 127–137. (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 30, 607–610. (1970).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Akbari, M. R., Pishbahar, I. & Dashti, Q. Identification of factors affecting food insecurity in rural households of Iran: Application of extended logit latent class model. Iran. J. Appl. Econ. Stud. 9, 91–125. (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagherzadeh Azar, F. et al. Estimation and comparison of food security status and the impact of economic variables on it in Iranian provinces. J. Appl. Econ. Theor. 4, 47–76 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shokri, N. & Asari Arani, A. Evaluation of factors affecting food security in Kermanshah province: Application of multiple regression method. Agric. Econ. Res. 1, 181–202 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanzadi, A., Karimi, M. S. & Shakouri, N. Estimation of food security in Kermanshah province with emphasis on FSI index. Agric. Econ. Dev. J. 1, 69–82. (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, J. I. M., Steg, L. & Dicke, M. Morality and reducing car use: Testing the norm activation model of prosocial behavior. Transportation Research Trends. New York, NY: NOVA (2007).

  • Chan, R. Y. K. & Lau, L. B. Y. Explaining green purchasing behavior. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 14, 9–40. (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, E. & Myers, L. Determinants of personal protective equipment (PPE) use in UK motorcyclists: Exploratory research applying an extended theory of planned behaviour. Accid. Anal. Prev. 60, 219–230. (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, L., Zhang, J., Wang, H. H., Zhang, L. & He, K. The impact of psychological factors on farmers’ intentions to reuse agricultural biomass waste for carbon emission abatement. J. Clean. Prod. 189, 797–804. (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazdanpanah, M., Hayati, D., Hochrainer-Stigler, S. & Zamani, G. H. Understanding farmers’ intention and behavior regarding water conservation in the Middle-East and North Africa: A case study in Iran. J. Environ. Manag. 135, 63–72. (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Setiawan, R., Santosa, W. & Sjafruddin, A. Entegration of theory of planned behavior and norm activation model on student behavior model using cars for traveling to campus. Civil Eng. Dimens. 2, 117–122. (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S., Hunecke, M. & Blobaum, A. Social context, personal norms and the use of publictransportation: Two field studies. J. Environ. Psychol. 3, 190–203. (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, M. & Leonard, R. How ecotheological beliefs vary among Australian churchgoers and consequences for environmental attitudes and behaviors. Rev. Relig. Res. 58, 101–124. (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. Public opinion about the environment: Testing measurement equivalence across countries. Int. J. Sociol. 45, 309–326. (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, Q. & Du, W. Social capital, environmental knowledge, and pro-environmental behavior. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022(19), 1443. (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Petzold, J. & Ratter, B. Climate change adaptation under a social capital approach—An analytical framework for small island. Ocean Coast. Manag. 112, 36–43. (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hua, Y., Dong, F. & Goodman, J. Howtoleveragetheroleofsocialcapitalinpro-environmental behavior: Acasestudy of residents’ express waste recycling behavior in China. J. Clean. Prod. 280, 124376. (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. D. & Meade, B. Who Are the World’s Food Insecure? Identifying the Risk Factors of Food Insecurity around the World. Amber Waves: The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, 2019(1490–2020–721) (2019).

  • Erinle, K. O. et al. Impacts of COVID-19 on agriculture and food security in developing countries: Potential mitigation strategies. South Asia 30, 13. (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. Theoretical perspectives. Self-Efficacy the Exercise of Control. 31–35 (1997).

  • Ashouri, D., Allahyari, M. S. & Damalas, C. A. Adoption of conservation farming practices for sustainable rice production among small-scale paddy farmers in northern Iran. Paddy Water Environ. 15, 237–248. (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Azami, A., Suleimani, A. & Aghai, H. Assessment of rural satisfaction with rural cooperative companies in Kermanshah province. Reg. Plan. J. 2, 15–26 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahmani Fazli, A. & Kavyani, Y. Performance evaluation of the agricultural bank in the allocation of rural micro credits. J. Appl. Res. Geogr. Sci. 14, 125–143 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Doustmohammadi, H. & Alavian, M. The analysis of social capital condition in Iran, in bass of post modernism theories of Michel Foucault. Biq. J. Sociol. Soc. Inst. 13, 39–66. (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    By admin

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *