International Energy Agency. The future of trucks — analysis. IEA (2017).
Transport Decarbonisation Alliance. Memorandum of Understanding on zero-emission medium- and heavy-duty vehicles. Transport Decarbonisation Alliance (2023).
MacDonnell, O. & Façanha, C. Multi-country Action Plan for the Global Memorandum of Understanding on Zero-Emission Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles (CALSTART, 2022).
Anenberg, S. C. et al. Impacts and mitigation of excess diesel-related NOx emissions in 11 major vehicle markets. Nature 545, 467–471 (2017).
Google Scholar
Tong, F., Jenn, A., Wolfson, D., Scown, C. D. & Auffhammer, M. Health and climate impacts from long-haul truck electrification. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 8514–8523 (2021).
Google Scholar
Camilleri, S. F. et al. Air quality, health and equity implications of electrifying heavy-duty vehicles. Nat. Sustain. 6, 1643–1653 (2023).
Google Scholar
International Council on Clean Transportation. Toward Greener and More Sustainable Freight Rail: Comparing Freight Rail Systems and Services in the United States and China (ICCT, 2024).
International Energy Agency. Global EV Outlook 2024. IEA (2024).
Torbatian, S. et al. Societal Co-benefits of zero-emission vehicles in the freight industry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 7814–7825 (2024).
Google Scholar
International Council on Clean Transportation. EU HDVs: Cost Effectiveness of Fuel Efficiency Technologies for Long-haul Tractor-Trailers in the 2025-2030 Timeframe (ICCT, 2018).
California Air Resource Board. Draft ACF Total Cost of Ownership Discussion Document (CARB, 2021).
US Department of Energy. The U.S. National Blueprint for Transportation Decarbonization: a joint strategy to transform transportation. US Department of Energy (2023).
European Commission. Lorries, buses and coaches. European Commission (2019).
Zhang, X., Lin, Z., Crawford, C. & Li, S. Techno-economic comparison of electrification for heavy-duty trucks in China by 2040. Transp. Res. Part. Transp. Environ. 102, 103152 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cano, Z. P. et al. Batteries and fuel cells for emerging electric vehicle markets. Nat. Energy 3, 279–289 (2018).
Google Scholar
Cullen, D. A. et al. New roads and challenges for fuel cells in heavy-duty transportation. Nat. Energy 6, 462–474 (2021).
Google Scholar
US Department of Energy. Biodiesel. Alternative Fuels Data Center (2025).
Ababneh, H. & Hameed, B. H. Electrofuels as emerging new green alternative fuel: a review of recent literature. Energy Convers. Manag. 254, 115213 (2022).
Google Scholar
California Air Resource Board. Low carbon fuel standard. CARB (2012).
Zhao, P. et al. Challenges and opportunities in truck electrification revealed by big operational data. Nat. Energy 9, 1427–1437 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hunter, C. et al. Technical report: Spatial and temporal analysis of the total cost of ownership for Class 8 tractors and Class 4 parcel delivery trucks. US Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information (2021).
Borlaug, B. et al. Heavy-duty truck electrification and the impacts of depot charging on electricity distribution systems. Nat. Energy 6, 673–682 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ledna, C., Muratori, M., Yip, A., Jadun, P. & Hoehne, C. Technical report: Decarbonizing medium- & heavy-duty on-road vehicles. Zero-emission vehicles cost analysis. US Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information (2022).
Wang, K., Zavaleta, V. G., Li, Y., Sarathy, S. M. & Abdul-Manan, A. F. N. Life-cycle CO2 mitigation of China’s class-8 heavy-duty trucks requires hybrid strategies. One Earth 5, 709–723 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhao, J., Burke, A. F., Miller, M. R. & Fulton, L. M. Vehicle choice modeling for emerging zero-emission medium- and heavy-duty vehicle markets in California. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 26, 101169 (2024).
Forrest, K., Mac Kinnon, M., Tarroja, B. & Samuelsen, S. Estimating the technical feasibility of fuel cell and battery electric vehicles for the medium and heavy duty sectors in California. Appl. Energy 276, 115439 (2020).
Google Scholar
Nykvist, B. & Olsson, O. The feasibility of heavy battery electric trucks. Joule 5, 901–913 (2021).
Google Scholar
Liu, R. et al. A cross-scale framework for evaluating flexibility values of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles. Nat. Commun. 15, 280 (2024).
Google Scholar
Cheng, X. & Lin, J. Is electric truck a viable alternative to diesel truck in long-haul operation? Transp. Res. Part. Transp. Environ. 129, 104119 (2024).
Google Scholar
International Council on Clean Transportation. Review of China’s Zero Emission Heavy-Duty Vehicle Market in 2022 (ICCT, 2022).
International Energy Agency. Global EV data explorer. IEA (2023).
International Council on Clean Transportation. Race to zero: zero-emission bus and truck market in China in 2023. ICCT (2023).
International Council on Clean Transportation. Total cost of ownership of alternative powertrain technologies for Class 8 long-haul trucks in the United States. ICCT (2023).
Tanco, M., Cat, L. & Garat, S. A break-even analysis for battery electric trucks in Latin America. J. Clean. Prod. 228, 1354–1367 (2019).
Google Scholar
US Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics & US Department of Commerce, US Census Bureau. 2021 Vehicle inventory and use survey datasets: 2021 public use file (PUF). Bureau of Transportation Statistics (2023).
Wentzel, H. Battery electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles. International Transport Forum (2022).
California Air Resource Board. Advanced clean trucks. CARB (2022).
European Commission. Directive (EU) 2023/2413 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 October 2023 Amending Directive (EU) 2018/2001, Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 and Directive 98/70/EC as Regards the Promotion of Energy from Renewable Sources, and Repealing Council Directive (EU) 2015/652 (European Commission, 2023).
Road Traffic Management Vehicle Types GA 802—2019 [in Chinese] (The Ministry of Public Security of the People’s Republic of China, 2019).
European Commission. Vehicle categories. European Commission (2013).
US Department of Energy. Vehicle weight classes & categories. US Department of Energy (2011).
Woody, M., Adderly, S. A., Bohra, R. & Keoleian, G. A. Electric and gasoline vehicle total cost of ownership across US cities. J. Ind. Ecol. 28, 194–215 (2024).
Google Scholar
Woody, M., Keoleian, G. A. & Vaishnav, P. Decarbonization potential of electrifying 50% of U.S. light-duty vehicle sales by 2030. Nat. Commun. 14, 7077 (2023).
Google Scholar
Liu, M., Wen, Y., Wu, X., Zhang, S. & Wu, Y. Province-level decarbonization potentials for China’s road transportation sector. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 18213–18221 (2024).
Google Scholar
US Department of Energy. Average Annual Vehicle Miles Traveled by Major Vehicle Category (US Department of Energy, 2022).
International Council on Clean Transportation. Literature review: Real-world fuel consumption of heavy-duty vehicles in the United States, China, and the European Union. ICCT (ICCT, 2015).
Sacchi, R., Bauer, C. & Cox, B. L. Does size matter? The influence of size, load factor, range autonomy, and application type on the life cycle assessment of current and future medium- and heavy-duty vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 5224–5235 (2021).
Google Scholar
Alonso-Villar, A., Davíðsdóttir, B., Stefánsson, H., Ásgeirsson, E. I. & Kristjánsson, R. Electrification potential for heavy-duty vehicles in harsh climate conditions: a case study based technical feasibility assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 417, 137997 (2023).
Google Scholar
The weights and dimensions law is crucial to accelerating zero-emission truck sales. Transport & Environment (2025).
Stolz, B., Held, M., Georges, G. & Boulouchos, K. Techno-economic analysis of renewable fuels for ships carrying bulk cargo in Europe. Nat. Energy 7, 203–212 (2022).
Google Scholar
Burnham, A. et al. Comprehensive total cost of ownership quantification for vehicles with different size classes and powertrains. Argonne National Laboratory (2021).
Wallington, T. J. et al. Green hydrogen pathways, energy efficiencies, and intensities for ground, air, and marine transportation. Joule 8, 2190–2207 (2024).
Google Scholar
International Council on Clean Transportation. Real-world performance of battery electric heavy-duty vehicles in China: energy consumption, range, and charging patterns. ICCT (ICCT, 2023).
Li, Y., Zhu, F., Li, L. & Ouyang, M. Electrifying heavy-duty truck through battery swapping. Joule (2024).
North American Council Freight Efficiency. Run on less — electric depot program. NACFE (2023).
Engholm, A., Zackrisson, A., Bengtsson, T., Link, S. & Plötz, P. Beyond replacing diesel trucks: how optimized fleet planning increases electrification and lowers transportation costs. Fraunhofer (2024).
Tessum, C. W., Marshall, J. D. & Hill, J. D. A spatially and temporally explicit life cycle inventory of air pollutants from gasoline and ethanol in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 11408–11417 (2012).
Google Scholar
Hawkins, T. R., Singh, B., Majeau-Bettez, G. & Strømman, A. H. Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles. J. Ind. Ecol. 17, 53–64 (2013).
Google Scholar
Bauer, C., Hofer, J., Althaus, H.-J., Del Duce, A. & Simons, A. The environmental performance of current and future passenger vehicles: Life cycle assessment based on a novel scenario analysis framework. Appl. Energy 157, 871–883 (2015).
Google Scholar
Liang, X. et al. Air quality and health benefits from fleet electrification in China. Nat. Sustain. 2, 962–971 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wang, F. et al. Multisectoral drivers of decarbonizing battery electric vehicles in China. PNAS Nexus 2, pgad123 (2023).
Google Scholar
Peiseler, L. et al. Carbon footprint distributions of lithium-ion batteries and their materials. Nat. Commun. 15, 10301 (2024).
Google Scholar
Evangelisti, S., Tagliaferri, C., Brett, D. J. L. & Lettieri, P. Life cycle assessment of a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell system for passenger vehicles. J. Clean. Prod. 142, 4339–4355 (2017).
Google Scholar
Argonne National Laboratory. Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation (GREET) model. ANL (2022).
Zhao, E., Walker, P. D., Surawski, N. C. & Bennett, N. S. Assessing the life cycle cumulative energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions of lithium-ion batteries. J. Energy Storage 43, 103193 (2021).
Google Scholar
Aichberger, C. & Jungmeier, G. Environmental life cycle impacts of automotive batteries based on a literature review. Energies 13, 6345 (2020).
Google Scholar
Peters, J. F. & Weil, M. Providing a common base for life cycle assessments of Li-ion batteries. J. Clean. Prod. 171, 704–713 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, F. et al. Carbon footprint and decarbonization potential of battery-grade synthetic graphite. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 13, 8298–8306 (2025).
Google Scholar
Liu, M. et al. Carbon footprint of battery-grade lithium chemicals in China. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 13, 3930–3938 (2025).
Google Scholar
Melin, H. E. et al. Global implications of the EU battery regulation. Science 373, 384–387 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cheng, A. L., Fuchs, E. R. H. & Michalek, J. J. US industrial policy may reduce electric vehicle battery supply chain vulnerabilities and influence technology choice. Nat. Energy 9, 1561–1570 (2024).
Google Scholar
Harper, G. et al. Recycling lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles. Nature 575, 75–86 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ma, X. et al. The evolution of lithium-ion battery recycling. Nat. Rev. Clean Technol. 1, 75–94 (2025).
Google Scholar
Liu, M. et al. Lithium-ion battery recycling: bridging regulation implementation and technological innovations for better battery sustainability. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 21385–21388 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jiang, S. et al. Environmental impacts of hydrometallurgical recycling and reusing for manufacturing of lithium-ion traction batteries in China. Sci. Total. Environ. 811, 152224 (2022).
Google Scholar
Xiong, Y. et al. Cradle-to-gate GHG emissions and decarbonization potentials of minivan-equipped hydrogen fuel cell system. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 212, 107877 (2025).
Google Scholar
Miotti, M., Hofer, J. & Bauer, C. Integrated environmental and economic assessment of current and future fuel cell vehicles. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 22, 94–110 (2017).
Google Scholar
Usai, L. et al. Life cycle assessment of fuel cell systems for light duty vehicles, current state-of-the-art and future impacts. J. Clean. Prod. 280, 125086 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Lan, L., Hao, Z. & Fu, P. Cradle–grave energy consumption, greenhouse gas and acidification emissions in current and future fuel cell vehicles: study based on five hydrogen production methods in China. Energy Rep. 8, 7931–7944 (2022).
Google Scholar
Benitez, A. et al. Ecological assessment of fuel cell electric vehicles with special focus on type IV carbon fiber hydrogen tank. J. Clean. Prod. 278, 123277 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y.-S., Lan, L.-B., Hao, Z. & Fu, P. Life cycle assessment and key parameter comparison of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles power systems. Environ. Sci. 43, 4402–4412 (2022).
Google Scholar
Notter, D. A., Kouravelou, K., Karachalios, T., Daletou, M. K. & Haberland, N. T. Life cycle assessment of PEM FC applications: electric mobility and μ-CHP. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 1969–1985 (2015).
Google Scholar
European Electricity Review 2024. Ember (2024).
Chen, X. et al. Impacts of fleet types and charging modes for electric vehicles on emissions under different penetrations of wind power. Nat. Energy 3, 413–421 (2018).
Google Scholar
Peterson, S. B., Apt, J. & Whitacre, J. F. Lithium-ion battery cell degradation resulting from realistic vehicle and vehicle-to-grid utilization. J. Power Sources 195, 2385–2392 (2010).
Google Scholar
Lu, J., Xiong, R., Tian, J., Wang, C. & Sun, F. Deep learning to estimate lithium-ion battery state of health without additional degradation experiments. Nat. Commun. 14, 2760 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, F., Zhai, Z., Zhao, Z., Di, Y. & Chen, X. Physics-informed neural network for lithium-ion battery degradation stable modeling and prognosis. Nat. Commun. 15, 4332 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Identifying degradation patterns of lithium ion batteries from impedance spectroscopy using machine learning. Nat. Commun. 11, 1706 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chen, J. et al. Emission mitigation potential from coordinated charging schemes for future private electric vehicles. Appl. Energy 308, 118385 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ziegler, M. S., Song, J. & Trancik, J. E. Determinants of lithium-ion battery technology cost decline. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 6074–6098 (2021).
Google Scholar
Global hydrogen review 2024 — analysis. IEA (2024).
Rau, G. H., Willauer, H. D. & Ren, Z. J. The global potential for converting renewable electricity to negative-CO2-emissions hydrogen. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 621–625 (2018).
Google Scholar
Yan, J. Negative-emissions hydrogen energy. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 560–561 (2018).
Google Scholar
Odenweller, A., Ueckerdt, F., Nemet, G. F., Jensterle, M. & Luderer, G. Probabilistic feasibility space of scaling up green hydrogen supply. Nat. Energy 7, 854–865 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kleijne, K. et al. Worldwide greenhouse gas emissions of green hydrogen production and transport. Nat. Energy 9, 1139–1152 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lee, D.-Y., Elgowainy, A. & Dai, Q. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of hydrogen fuel production from chlor-alkali processes in the United States. Appl. Energy 217, 467–479 (2018).
Google Scholar
US Department of Energy. Clean Hydrogen Production Standard Guidance. US Department of Energy (2022).
Wolfram, P., Kyle, P., Zhang, X., Gkantonas, S. & Smith, S. Using ammonia as a shipping fuel could disturb the nitrogen cycle. Nat. Energy 7, 1112–1114 (2022).
Google Scholar
Schuler, J., Ardone, A. & Fichtner, W. A review of shipping cost projections for hydrogen-based energy carriers. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 49, 1497–1508 (2024).
Google Scholar
US Department of Energy. Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. US Department of Energy (2022).
European Commission. Directive — EU — 2023/2413 — Renewable Energy Directive. European Commission (2023).
Brynolf, S. et al. Review of electrofuel feasibility — prospects for road, ocean, and air transport. Prog. Energy 4, 042007 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ueckerdt, F. et al. Potential and risks of hydrogen-based e-fuels in climate change mitigation. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 384–393 (2021).
Google Scholar
McNeil, W. H. et al. Impact of truck electrification on air pollution disparities in the United States. Nat. Sustain. (2025).
Vaishnav, P., Tian, Y., Isaac, C. & Mohan, A. Automation and electrification in long-haul trucking cuts urban health and environmental damages. Transp. Res. Part. Transp. Environ. 131, 104187 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lao, J., Song, H., Wang, C. & Zhou, Y. Research on atmospheric pollutant and greenhouse gas emission reductions of trucks by substituting fuel oil with green hydrogen: a case study. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 48, 11555–11566 (2023).
Google Scholar
Liu, X., Elgowainy, A., Vijayagopal, R. & Wang, M. Well-to-wheels analysis of zero-emission plug-in battery electric vehicle technology for medium- and heavy-duty trucks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 538–546 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sharma, A., Shiwang, J., Lee, A. & Peng, W. Equity implications of electric vehicles: a systematic review on the spatial distribution of emissions, air pollution and health impacts. Environ. Res. Lett. 18, 053001 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sharma, A. et al. Multisectoral emission impacts of electric vehicle transition in China and India. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 19639–19650 (2024).
Google Scholar
Xu, Y. et al. Assessment of alternative fuel and powertrain transit bus options using real-world operations data: life-cycle fuel and emissions modeling. Appl. Energy 154, 143–159 (2015).
Google Scholar
Sripad, S. & Viswanathan, V. Quantifying the economic case for electric semi-trucks. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 149–155 (2019).
Google Scholar
Link, S., Stephan, A., Speth, D. & Plötz, P. Rapidly declining costs of truck batteries and fuel cells enable large-scale road freight electrification. Nat. Energy 9, 1032–1039 (2024).
Google Scholar
International Council on Clean Transportation. A Total Cost of Ownership Comparison of Truck Decarbonization Pathways in Europe (ICCT, 2023).
International Council on Clean Transportation. Electrifying last-mile delivery: a total cost of ownership comparison of battery-electric and diesel trucks in Europe. ICCT (2022).
Burke, A. F., Zhao, J., Miller, M. R., Sinha, A. & Fulton, L. M. Projections of the costs of medium- and heavy-duty battery-electric and fuel cell vehicles (2020–2040) and related economic issues. Energy Sustain. Dev. 77, 101343 (2023).
Google Scholar
Noll, B., del Val, S., Schmidt, T. S. & Steffen, B. Analyzing the competitiveness of low-carbon drive-technologies in road-freight: a total cost of ownership analysis in Europe. Appl. Energy 306, 118079 (2022).
Google Scholar
Sripad, S. & Viswanathan, V. Quantifying the economic case for electric semi-trucks. ACS Energy Lett. (2018).
Google Scholar
International Council on Clean Transportation. Total cost of ownership parity between battery-electric trucks and diesel trucks in India. ICCT (2024).
International Council on Clean Transportation. Total cost of ownership for tractor-trailers in Europe: battery electric versus diesel. ICCT (2021).
Lanz, L., Noll, B., Schmidt, T. S. & Steffen, B. Comparing the levelized cost of electric vehicle charging options in Europe. Nat. Commun. 13, 5277 (2022).
Google Scholar
Danielis, R., Niazi, A. M. K., Scorrano, M., Masutti, M. & Awan, A. M. The economic feasibility of battery electric trucks: a review of the total cost of ownership estimates. Energies 18, 429 (2025).
Google Scholar
Hu, M. et al. TCO analysis of commercial vehicles considering refined temperature impacts across various provinces in China. Energy Sustain. Dev. 87, 101726 (2025).
Google Scholar
Wang, Z. et al. A total cost of ownership analysis of zero emission powertrain solutions for the heavy goods vehicle sector. J. Clean. Prod. 434, 139910 (2024).
Google Scholar
Phadke, A., Khandekar, A., Abhyankar, N., Wooley, D. & Rajagopal, D. Why regional and long-haul trucks are primed for electrification now. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2021).
Renwei, C. Research on TCO of commercial vehicles in China and comparison between China and US. Automotive Data of China (2022).
Transport & Environment. How to buy an electric truck. Transport & Environment (2024).
California Clean Truck and Bus Incentives. Hybrid and zero-emission truck and bus Voucher Incentive Project (HVIP). California Clean Truck and Bus Incentives (2023).
International Council on Clean Transportation. Total cost of ownership for heavy trucks in China: battery electric, fuel cell, and diesel trucks. ICCT (2021).
Rout, C., Li, H., Dupont, V. & Wadud, Z. A comparative total cost of ownership analysis of heavy duty on-road and off-road vehicles powered by hydrogen, electricity, and diesel. Heliyon 8, e12417 (2022).
Google Scholar
Halder, P. et al. Performance, emissions and economic analyses of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 199, 114543 (2024).
Google Scholar
Qiu, L. & Howland, M. F. Going beyond decarbonization: designing renewables for environmental co-benefits. Joule 8, 563–565 (2024).
Google Scholar
Burke, A., Miller, M., Sinha, A. & Fulton, L. Evaluation of the economics of battery-electric and fuel cell trucks and buses: methods, issues, and results. UC Davis: Sustainable Transportation Energy Pathways (STEPS) (UC Davis, 2022).
Tan, X., Ou, S., Wu, S., Chen, Y. & Lin, Z. Projected Perceived Cost of Ownership for Commercial Vehicle Powertrains in China by 2040. SAE Technical Paper No. 2025-01-8590 (2025).
Biller, T. E. CO2 Abatement Costs of Long-haul Heavy-duty Truck Technologies in Germany in 2020 and 2030: A Techno-economic Analysis Based on State-of-the-art Research. Master’s Thesis, Norwegian School of Economics (2020).
Burke, A. & Sinha, A. K. Technology, sustainability, and marketing of battery electric and hydrogen fuel cell medium-duty and heavy-duty trucks and buses in 2020-2040. National Centre for Sustainable Transportation (2020).
Mao, S. & Rodríguez, F. Zero-Emission Medium- and Heavy-duty Vehicles in China 2024 (ICCT, 2024).
Jahangir, M. S. et al. Levelized cost of driving for medium and heavy-duty battery electric trucks. Appl. Energy 361, 122976 (2024).
Google Scholar
IPCC. IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, Chapter 6: Energy Systems (IPCC, 2022).
Lagouvardou, S., Lagemann, B., Psaraftis, H. N., Lindstad, E. & Erikstad, S. O. Marginal abatement cost of alternative marine fuels and the role of market-based measures. Nat. Energy 8, 1209–1220 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yang, X., Nielsen, C. P., Song, S. & McElroy, M. B. Breaking the hard-to-abate bottleneck in China’s path to carbon neutrality with clean hydrogen. Nat. Energy 7, 955–965 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chen, X. et al. Pathway toward carbon-neutral electrical systems in China by mid-century with negative CO2 abatement costs informed by high-resolution modeling. Joule 5, 2715–2741 (2021).
Google Scholar
Virguez, E., Wang, X. & Patiño-Echeverri, D. Utility-scale photovoltaics and storage: decarbonizing and reducing greenhouse gases abatement costs. Appl. Energy 282, 116120 (2021).
Google Scholar
Peng, W. et al. The surprisingly inexpensive cost of state-driven emission control strategies. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 738–745 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bednar, J. et al. Operationalizing the net-negative carbon economy. Nature 596, 377–383 (2021).
Google Scholar
Keller, V. et al. Electricity system and emission impact of direct and indirect electrification of heavy-duty transportation. Energy 172, 740–751 (2019).
Google Scholar
Martin, J., Dimanchev, E. & Neumann, A. Carbon abatement costs for renewable fuels in hard-to-abate transport sectors. Adv. Appl. Energy 12, 100156 (2023).
Google Scholar
Pääkkönen, A., Aro, K., Aalto, P., Konttinen, J. & Kojo, M. The potential of biomethane in replacing fossil fuels in heavy transport — a case study on Finland. Sustainability 11, 4750 (2019).
Google Scholar
International Council on Clean Transportation. Real-world use cases for zero-emission trucks: port tractor-trailers and concrete mixer trucks in Hainan province, China. ICCT (2024).
Cullen, J. A. & Mansur, E. T. Inferring carbon abatement costs in electricity markets: a revealed preference approach using the shale revolution. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 9, 106–133 (2017).
Google Scholar
Friedmann, J. et al. Levelized Cost of Carbon Abatement: An Improved Cost-Assessment Methodology for a Net-Zero Emissions World (Center on Global Energy Policy Columbia Univ., 2020).
International Energy Agency. Abatement costs for road vehicles. IEA (2020).
Desai, R. R., Chen, R. B., Hittinger, E. & Williams, E. Heterogeneity in economic and carbon benefits of electric technology vehicles in the US. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 1136–1146 (2020).
Google Scholar
International Council on Clean Transportation. A meta-study of purchase costs for zero-emission trucks. ICCT (2022).
Burke, A. F., Zhao, J. & Fulton, L. M. Projections of the costs of light-duty battery-electric and fuel cell vehicles (2020–2040) and related economic issues. Res. Transp. Econ. 105, 101440 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhao, J., Burke, A., Miller, M. & Fulton, L. Market prospects of fuel cell vs. battery-electric trucks in medium- and heavy-duty segments in California, 2025 to 2040. Sustainable Freight Research Center (2024).
Busch, C. Fast-Falling Battery Prices Boost Economic Benefits Expected from Heavy-Duty Vehicle Electrification (Energy Innovation, 2024).
Bai, F., Zhao, F., Liu, X., Liu, Z. & Reiner, D. M. A cost-effectiveness comparison of renewable energy pathways for decarbonizing heavy-duty vehicles in China. Energy Convers. Manag. 322, 119111 (2024).
Google Scholar
Basma, H. & Rodríguez, F. The European heavy-duty vehicle market until 2040: analysis of decarbonization pathways. ICCT (2023).
Transport & Environment. How to Decarbonize Long-Haul Trucks in Germany (Transport & Environment, 2021).
International Hydrogen Net. Application of hydrogen energy in the field of transportation and cost analysis of fuel cell vehicles — hydrogen fuel cell [in Chinese]. International Hydrogen Net (2022).
International Council on Clean Transportation. Fuel cell electric tractor-trailers: technology overview and fuel economy. ICCT (2022).
Netherlands Enterprise Agency. Purchase subsidy zero emission trucks AanZET. RVO (2025).
The Ministry of Finance of the People’s Republic of China. Notice on adjusting the financial subsidy policy for the promotion and application of new energy vehicles (in Chinese). Ministry of Finance of the People’s Republic of China (2020).
US Department of Energy. National Zero-Emission Freight Corridor Strategy (US Department of Energy, 2024).
European Council. Fit for 55. European Council (2021).
International Council on Clean Transportation. The Revised CO2 Standards for Heavy-Duty Vehicles in the European Union (ICCT, 2024).
Transport Canada. Incentives for medium- and heavy-duty zero-emission vehicles. Transport Canada (2024).
Kersey, J., Popovich, N. D. & Phadke, A. A. Rapid battery cost declines accelerate the prospects of all-electric interregional container shipping. Nat. Energy 7, 664–674 (2022).
Google Scholar
Joshi, A., Sharma, R. & Baral, B. Comparative life cycle assessment of conventional combustion engine vehicle, battery electric vehicle and fuel cell electric vehicle in Nepal. J. Clean. Prod. 379, 134407 (2022).
Google Scholar
Booto, G. K., Aamodt Espegren, K. & Hancke, R. Comparative life cycle assessment of heavy-duty drivetrains: a Norwegian study case. Transp. Res. Part. Transp. Environ. 95, 102836 (2021).
Google Scholar
Austin, K. G., Jones, J. P. H. & Clark, C. M. A review of domestic land use change attributable to U.S. biofuel policy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 159, 112181 (2022).
Google Scholar
Deviany, D. & Chaerun, S. K. in Solid-Gaseous Biofuels Production, 229–243 (Wiley, 2024).
Shi, K. et al. Perspectives and outlook of e-fuels: production, cost effectiveness, and applications. Energy Fuels 38, 7665–7692 (2024).
Google Scholar
International Council on Clean Transportation. Heavy-Duty Zero-Emission Vehicles: Pace and Opportunities for a Rapid Global Transition (ICCT, 2022).
The Government of the People’s Republic of China. Vehicle purchase tax law of the People’s Republic of China. The Government of the People’s Republic of China (2018).
The Government of the People’s Republic of China. New energy vehicle purchase tax exemption policy extended to the end of 2027. The Government of the People’s Republic of China (2023).
Chen, Y. & Hu, Y. The development trend and policy recommendations of biodiesel in China [in Chinese]. New Economy Future Industry (2023).
International Energy Agency. Biodiesel and diesel prices, 2019 to April 2022. IEA (2022).
US Department of Energy. Clean Cities and Communities Alternative Fuel Price Report, January 2025 (US Department of Energy, 2025).
International Council on Clean Transportation. Race to zero: European heavy duty vehicle market development quarterly (January – March 2024). ICCT (2024).
The Government of the People’s Republic of China. Notice on the demonstration application of fuel cell vehicles. The Government of the People’s Republic of China (2020).
The Government of the People’s Republic of China. Regulations on compulsory motor vehicle traffic accident liability insurance. The Government of the People’s Republic of China (2019).
US Department of Energy. Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office multi-year program plan. US Department of Energy (2024).
Deloitte. Fueling the future of mobility: fuel-cell buses. Deloitte (2020).
Xu, F., Crawford, C., Feng, Y., Lin, Z. & Li, S. Environment-economic analysis of diesel, hybrid electric, plug-in hybrid electric trucks in China. Transp. Res. Part. Transp. Environ. 117, 103661 (2023).
Google Scholar
International Council on Clean Transportation. The European heavy-duty vehicle market until 2040: analysis of decarbonization pathways. ICCT (2023).
US Department of Energy. Hydrogen delivery roadmap. US Department of Energy (2017).
Reddi, K., Elgowainy, A., Rustagi, N. & Gupta, E. Impact of hydrogen refueling configurations and market parameters on the refueling cost of hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 42, 21855–21865 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhou, Y., Searle, S. & Baldino, C. Cost of Renewable Hydrogen Produced Onsite at Hydrogen Refueling Stations in Europe (ICCT, 2022).
Nan, L. et al. Techno-economic analysis of fuel cell trucks with different powertrain hybridization and hydrogen resources by 2040: case study of China. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 132, 174–182 (2025).
Google Scholar
International Council on Clean Transportation. Zero-emission medium- and heavy-duty vehicle market in China (January–June 2024). ICCT (2024).
International Council on Clean Transportation. Race to zero: European heavy-duty vehicle market development quarterly (January–December 2024). ICCT (2024).
FAW Jiefang “Xingyi” hydrogen energy twin star series products were officially launched in Qingdao. Sohu News (2024).
S-eWAY-FCEV, the 6×2 hydrogen-powered tractor. IVECO (2025).
TRE FCEV — Nikola Hydrogen-Electric Semi-Truck. Nikola (2022).
Department for Transport of the United Kingdom. Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation (UK Department for Transport, 2024).
Government of Canada. Compliance with the Clean Fuel Regulations (Government of Canada, 2024).
The Ministry of Finance of the People’s Republic of China. Announcement on adjusting technical requirements for energy-saving and new energy vehicles enjoying vehicle and vessel tax benefits (in Chinese). The Government of the People’s Republic of China (2024).
Transport & Environment. Tolling: the highway to green trucking. Transport & Environment (2025).
Many provinces announced that hydrogen-powered vehicles will be exempt from highway tolls, and the industry has entered a period of rapid growth and acceleration. Xinhua News (2024).
European Commission. The Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation. European Commission (2024).
The Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. Opinions of the Ministry of Transport on the State Power Investment Corporation to carry out pilot projects for building a strong transportation nation, such as the construction, networking and operation demonstration of heavy-duty truck swap stations (in Chinese). The Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China (2024).
Hao, X. et al. Evaluating the current perceived cost of ownership for buses and trucks in China. Energy 254, 124383 (2022).
Google Scholar
link