Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. How much physical activity do adults need? 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/basics/adults/index.htm.
UK Department of Health. Be active, be healthy: a plan for getting the nation moving. 2009.
World Health Organization. Physical activity. 2024. Accessed 9 Sep 2024.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, World Health Organization. Step up! Tackling the burden of insufficient physical activity in Europe. 2023.
Strain T, Flaxman S, Guthold R, Semenova E, Cowan M, Riley LM, et al. National, regional, and global trends in insufficient physical activity among adults from 2000 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 507 population-based surveys with 5·7 million participants. Lancet Glob Heal. 2024;12:e1232–43.
Google Scholar
Rojas-rueda D, de Nazelle A, Teixidó O, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. Replacing car trips by increasing bike and public transport in the greater Barcelona metropolitan area: a health impact assessment study. Environ Int. 2012;49:100–9.
Google Scholar
Flores-Mateo G, Granado-Font E, Ferré-Grau C, Montaña-Carreras X. Mobile phone apps to promote weight loss and increase physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e253.
Google Scholar
Pfaeffli Dale L, Dobson R, Whittaker R, Maddison R. The effectiveness of mobile-health behaviour change interventions for cardiovascular disease self-management: a systematic review. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23:801–17.
Google Scholar
Schippers M, Adam PCG, Smolenski DJ, Wong HTH, de Wit JBF. A meta-analysis of overall effects of weight loss interventions delivered via mobile phones and effect size differences according to delivery mode, personal contact, and intervention intensity and duration. Obes Rev. 2017;18:450–9.
Google Scholar
World Health Organization. mHealth: New horizons for health through mobile technologies: second global survey on eHealth. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2011.
Taylor P. Forecast number of mobile users worldwide 2020–2025. Statista. 2023. https://www.statista.com/statistics/218984/number-of-global-mobile-users-since-2010/.
Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Hardeman W, Eccles MP, Cane J, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques : building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions the behavior change technique taxonomy ( v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered T. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46:81–95.
Google Scholar
Domin A, Spruijt-Metz D, Theisen D, Ouzzahra Y, Vögele C. Smartphone-based interventions for physical activity promotion: scoping review of the evidence over the last 10 years. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2021;9:e24308.
Google Scholar
Deterding S, Dixon D, Khaled R, Nacke L. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining “Gamification.” In: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: envisioning future media environments. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. 2011:9–15.
LeBlanc AG, Chaput JP. Pokémon Go: a game changer for the physical inactivity crisis? Prev Med (Baltim). 2017;101:235–7.
Google Scholar
Cugelman B. Gamification: what it is and why it matters to digital health behavior change developers. JMIR Serious Games. 2013;1:1–6.
Google Scholar
Barreto L, Amaral A, Pereira T, Paiva S. A review of use cases of gamification in mobility systems and services. In: Nathanail EG, Gavanas N, Adamos G, editors. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. 2023:335–47.
Marquart H, Schuppan J. Promoting sustainable mobility: to what extent is “Health” considered by mobility app studies? A review and a conceptual framework. Sustainability. 2022;14:47.
Google Scholar
Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Kleijnen J, Franco OH. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Syst Rev. 2017;6:1–12.
Google Scholar
Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence systematic review software [online software]. Melbourne, Australia: Veritas Health Innovation; 2024. Available from: www.covidence.org.
Facundo O. Google-play-scraper [Internet]. 2020. Available from: License: MIT.
Facundo O. App-store-scraper [Internet]. 2020. Available from: Licene: MIT.
Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Zelenko O, Tjondronegoro D, Mani M. Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2015;3:1–9.
Google Scholar
McKay FH, Slykerman S, Dunn M. The app behavior change scale: creation of a scale to assess the potential of apps to promote behavior change. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2019;7:e11130.
Google Scholar
Stoyanov S. MARS training video. YouTube. 2014. Accessed 24 Jan 2025.
Cellina F, Simão J, Mangili F, Vermes N, Granato P. Outcomes of a smart city living lab prompting low-carbon mobility patterns by a mobile app. Presented at: 18th Swiss Transport Research Conference; 2018 May 16-18; Ascona, Switzerland.
Cellina F, Simão JV, Mangili F, Vermes N, Granato P. Sustainable mobility persuasion via smartphone apps: lessons from a Swiss case study on how to design point-based rewarding systems. Travel Behav Soc. 2022;2023(31):178–88.
Cellina F, Vittucci Marzetti G, Gui M. Self-selection and attrition biases in app-based persuasive technologies for mobility behavior change: evidence from a Swiss case study. Comput Human Behav. 2021;125:106970.
Google Scholar
Hasshu S, Chiclana F, Passow BN, Elizondo D. Encouraging active commuting through monitoring and analysis of commuter travel method habits. In: 2015 SAI Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys); 2015 Nov 10-11; London, UK. New York: IEEE; 2015. p. 179–86.
Bopp M, Sims D, Matthews SA, Rovniak LS, Poole E, Colgan J. Development, implementation, and evaluation of active lions: a campaign to promote active travel to a university campus. Am J Heal Promot. 2017;32:536–45.
Google Scholar
Bopp M, Sims D, Matthews SA, Rovniak LS, Poole E, Colgan J. There׳s an app for that: development of a smartphone app to promote active travel to a college campus. J Transp Heal. 2016;3:305–14.
Google Scholar
Minnich A. Gamification in the transport sector: Quasi-experimental evidence from a bicycle navigation app. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2022;2023(167):103552.
Ross T, Burris A, Oliveira L, Arnott B, Araujo-Soares V. A feasibility study of the effect of phone-based feedback of other commuters’ subjective experiences on driver intentions to change. In: Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). 2015:548–58.
Máca V, Ščasný M, Zvěřinová I, Jakob M, Hrnčíř J. Incentivizing commuter cycling by financial and non-financial rewards. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1–14.
Google Scholar
Pajarito Grajales DF, Degbelo A, Gould M. Collaboration or competition: the impact of incentive types on urban cycling. Int J Sustain Transp. 2020;14:761–76.
Google Scholar
Park H, Sanguinetti A, Castillo CG. EcoTrips. In: Marcus A, Wang W, editors. Design, user experience, and usability: designing pleasurable experiences. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 60–76.
Google Scholar
Cellina F, Bucher D, Veiga Simão J, Rudel R, Raubal M. Beyond limitations of current behaviour change apps for sustainable mobility: insights from a user-centered design and evaluation process. Sustainability. 2019;11:2281.
Google Scholar
Cellina F, Bucher D, Rudel R, Raubal M, Rizzoli AE. Promoting sustainable mobility styles using eco-feedback and gamification elements : introducing the GoEco ! living lab experiment. Presented at: BEHAVE 2016 4th European Conference on Behaviour and Energy Efficiency; 2016 Sep 8-9; Coimbra, Portugal.
Sottile E, Giacchetti T, Tuveri G, Piras F, Calli D, Concas V, et al. An innovative GPS smartphone based strategy for university mobility management: a case study at the University of RomaTre. Italy Res Transp Econ. 2020;2021(85):100926.
Castellanos S. Delivering modal-shift incentives by using gamification and smartphones: a field study example in Bogota. Colombia Case Stud Transp Policy. 2016;4:269–78.
Google Scholar
Caroleo B, Morelli N, Lissandrello E, Vesco A, Di Dio S, Mauro S. Measuring the change towards more sustainable mobility: MUV impact evaluation approach. Systems. 2019;7:30.
Google Scholar
Saucedo-Araujo RG, Huertas-Delgado FJ, Barranco-Ruiz YM, Pérez-López IJ, Aznar-Laín S, Chillón P, et al. Testing the mystic school mobile application to promote active commuting to school in Spanish adolescents: the PACO Study. Children. 2022;9:1997.
Google Scholar
Roider O, Wegener S, Stark J, Judmaier P, Michelberger F, Barberi A. Merging virtual world with real-life behavior: a concept for a smartphone app to influence young people’s travel behavior. Transp Res Rec. 2019;2673:241–50.
Google Scholar
Semanjski I, Aguirre AJL, De Mol J, Gautama S. Policy 2.0 platform for mobile sensing and incentivized targeted shifts in mobility behavior. Sensors (Switzerland). 2016;16:1035.
Google Scholar
Gupta T, Kar N, Mishra W, Loudon G. Persuasive design for sustainable mobility. In: IndiaHCI ’21: Proceedings of the 12th Indian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction; 2021 Nov 19-21; Virtual Event, India. New York, NY: ACM; 2021. p. 123-127.
Gabrielli S, Maimone R. Are change strategies affecting users’ transportation choices? In: Proceedings of the Biannual Conference of the Italian Chapter of SIGCHI. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2013:1–4.
Anagnostopoulou E, Urbančič J, Bothos E, Magoutas B, Bradesko L, Schrammel J, et al. From mobility patterns to behavioural change: leveraging travel behaviour and personality profiles to nudge for sustainable transportation. J Intell Inf Syst. 2020;54:157–78.
Google Scholar
Tsirimpa A, Polydoropoulou A, Pagoni I, Tsouros I. A reward-based instrument for promoting multimodality. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2019;65:121–40.
Google Scholar
Ferron M, Loria E, Marconi A, Massa P. Play & go, an urban game promoting behaviour change for sustainable mobility. Interact Des Archit. 2019;40:24–45.
Jariyasunant J, Carrel A, Ekambaram V, Gaker DJ, Kote T, Sengupta R, et al. The quantified traveler: using personal travel data to promote sustainable transport behavior. 2012:1–20.
Ciccone A, Fyhri A, Sundfør HB. Using behavioral insights to incentivize cycling: results from a field experiment. J Econ Behav Organ. 2021;188:1035–58.
Google Scholar
Huang B, Thomas T, Groenewolt B, van Berkum EC. An investigation of the motivators and barriers of smartphone app incentives for encouraging cycling. Decis Anal J. 2022;5:100127.
Google Scholar
Huang B, Thomas T, Groenewolt B, Claasen Y, van Berkum E. Effectiveness of incentives offered by mobile phone app to encourage cycling: a long-term study. IET Intell Transp Syst. 2021;15:406–22.
Google Scholar
Huang B, Thomas T, Groenewolt B, Fioreze T, Berkum E Van. How to use smartphone apps to encourage cycling: clues from a Living Lab with SMART in Enschede. 2019:3–6.
Navarro KF, Gay V, Golliard L, Johnston B, Leijdekkers P, Vaughan E, et al. SocialCycle what can a mobile app do to encourage cycling? In: 38th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks – Workshops; 2013 Oct 21-24; Sydney, NSW, Australia. New York: IEEE; 2013. p. 24–30.
Goetz A, Marinica I, Mayr H, Mosetti L, Schubert R. Do mobile applications foster sustainable mobility? Evidence from a field experiment. SSRN Electron J. 2023. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4310386.
Cirrincione L, Di Dio S, Peri G, Scaccianoce G, Schillaci D, Rizzo G. A win-win scheme for improving the environmental sustainability of university commuters’ mobility and getting environmental credits. Energies. 2022;15:396.
Google Scholar
Di Dio S, Massa F, Nucara A, Peri G, Rizzo G, Schillaci D. Pursuing softer urban mobility behaviors through game-based apps. Heliyon. 2020;6:e03930.
Google Scholar
Di Dio S, La Gennusa M, Peri G, Rizzo G, Vinci I. Involving people in the building up of smart and sustainable cities: how to influence commuters’ behaviors through a mobile app game. Sustain Cities Soc. 2018;42:325–36.
Google Scholar
Ek A, Alexandrou C, Söderström E, Bergman P, Delisle Nyström C, Direito A, et al. Effectiveness of a 3-month mobile phone-based behavior change program on active transportation and physical activity in adults: randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2020;8:e18531–e18531.
Google Scholar
Ek A, Alexandrou C, Delisle Nyström C, Direito A, Eriksson U, Hammar U, et al. The Smart City Active Mobile Phone Intervention (SCAMPI) study to promote physical activity through active transportation in healthy adults: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:880.
Google Scholar
Lindqvist AK, Rutberg S, Söderström E, Ek A, Alexandrou C, Maddison R, et al. User perception of a smartphone app to promote physical activity through active transportation: inductive qualitative content analysis within the smart city active mobile phone intervention (SCAMPI) study. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2020;8:e19380.
Google Scholar
Merlin LA, Freeman K, Renne J, Hoermann S. Clustered randomized controlled trial protocol of a Mobility-as-a-Service app for College campuses. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021;2022(14):100572.
Bandura A. Human agency in social cognitive theory. Am Psychol. 1989;44:1175–84.
Google Scholar
Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:179–211.
Google Scholar
Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Transtheoretical therapy: toward a more integrative model of change. Psychother Theory, Res Pract. 1982;19:276–88.
Google Scholar
Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:297–322.
Google Scholar
Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. 2000;11:227–68.
Google Scholar
Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Boston, MA: Springer; 1985.
Schwartz SH. Normative influences on altruism. In: Berkowitz L, editor. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 10. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1977. p. 221–79.
Gee JP. Learning and games. In: Salen K, editor. The ecology of games: connecting youth, games, and learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2008. p. 21–40.
Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 1979;47:263–91.
Google Scholar
Fogg BJ. Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers; 2003.
Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull. 1996;119:254–84.
Google Scholar
Hermsen S, Frost J, Renes RJ, Kerkhof P. Using feedback through digital technology to disrupt and change habitual behavior: a critical review of current literature. Comput Human Behav. 2016;57:61–74.
Google Scholar
Carver CS, Scheier MF. Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychol Bull. 1982;92:111–35.
Google Scholar
Gardner B, Whittington C, McAteer J, Eccles MP, Michie S. Using theory to synthesise evidence from behaviour change interventions: the example of audit and feedback. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70:1618–25.
Google Scholar
Riley R, de Preux L, Capella P, Mejia C, Kajikawa Y, de Nazelle A. How do we effectively communicate air pollution to change public attitudes and behaviours? A review Sustain Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01038-2.
Glazener A, Sanchez K, Ramani T, Zietsman J, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Mindell JS, et al. Fourteen pathways between urban transportation and health: a conceptual model and literature review. J Transp Heal. 2021;21:101070.
Google Scholar
De Nazelle A, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Antó JM, Brauer M, Briggs D, Braun-Fahrlander C, et al. Improving health through policies that promote active travel: a review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. Environ Int. 2011;37:766–77.
Google Scholar
Yang X, Orjuela JP, McCoy E, Vich G, Anaya-Boig E, Avila-Palencia I, et al. The impact of black carbon (BC) on mode-specific galvanic skin response (GSR) as a measure of stress in urban environments. Environ Res. 2022;214:114083.
Google Scholar
Chatterton TJ, Coulter A, Musselwhite C, Lyons G, Clegg S. Understanding how transport choices are affected by the environment and health: views expressed in a study on the use of carbon calculators. Public Health. 2009;123:e45–9.
Google Scholar
Woodcock J, Edwards P, Tonne C, Armstrong BG, Ashiru O, Banister D, et al. Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: urban land transport. Lancet. 2009;374:1930–43.
Google Scholar
Woolley K, Fishbach A. For the fun of it: harnessing immediate rewards to increase persistence in long-term goals. J Consum Res. 2016;42:952–66.
Google Scholar
Deci EL. Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1971;18:105–15.
Google Scholar
Moller AC, Ntoumanis N, Williams GC. Financial incentives may influence health behaviors, but do we end up with less than we paid for? A self-determination theory perspective. Ann Behav Med. 2019;53:939–41.
Google Scholar
Verplanken B, Sui J. Habit and identity: behavioral, cognitive, affective, and motivational facets of an integrated self. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1504.
Google Scholar
Ng JYY, Ntoumanis N, Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, Deci EL, Ryan RM, Duda JL, et al. Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: a meta-analysis. Perspect Psychol Sci a J Assoc Psychol Sci. 2012;7:325–40.
Google Scholar
Gillison FB, Rouse P, Standage M, Sebire SJ, Ryan RM. A meta-analysis of techniques to promote motivation for health behaviour change from a self-determination theory perspective. Health Psychol Rev. 2019;13:110–30.
Google Scholar
Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7:e11.
Google Scholar
Amagai S, Pila S, Kaat AJ, Nowinski CJ, Gershon RC. Challenges in participant engagement and retention using mobile health apps: literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24:e35120.
Google Scholar
Rainie L, Wellman B. Networked: the new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2012.
Garnett C, Crane D, West R, Brown J, Michie S. Identification of behavior change techniques and engagement strategies to design a smartphone app to reduce alcohol consumption using a formal consensus method. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2015;3:e73.
Google Scholar
Heckman JJ. Selection bias and self-selection bt – econometrics. In: Eatwell J, Milgate M, Newman P, editors. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 1990:201–24.
Hannak A, Sapiezynski P, Molavi Kakhki A, Krishnamurthy B, Lazer D, Mislove A, et al. Measuring personalization of web search. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2013:527–538.
Aitken M, Nass D. Digital health trends 2021: innovation, evidence, regulation, and adoption. Parsippany, NJ: IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science; 2021.
link