Jaramillo, P. et al. Transport. In Climate Change 2022 – Mitigation of Climate Change (eds. Cheah, L. & Sims, R. E. H.) 1049–1160 (Cambridge University Press, 2023).
Boogaard, H. et al. Long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution and non-accidental mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Int. 176, 107916 (2023).
Google Scholar
Anenberg, S. C., Miller, J., Henze, D. K., Minjares, R. & Achakulwisut, P. The global burden of transportation tailpipe emissions on air pollution-related mortality in 2010 and 2015. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 094012 (2019).
Google Scholar
Markard, J., Raven, R. & Truffer, B. Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects. Res. Policy 41, 955–967 (2012).
Google Scholar
Geels, F. W. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit 1, 24–40 (2011).
Google Scholar
Axsen, J., Plötz, P. & Wolinetz, M. Crafting strong, integrated policy mixes for deep CO2 mitigation in road transport. Nat. Clim. Chang 10, 809–818 (2020).
Google Scholar
Grubb, M. et al. Induced innovation in energy technologies and systems: a review of evidence and potential implications for CO2 mitigation. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 043007 (2021).
Google Scholar
Blanco, G. et al. Innovation, Technology Development and Transfer. In Climate Change 2022 – Mitigation of Climate Change (eds. Mahmoud, N. & Mizuno, E.) 1641–1726 (Cambridge University Press, 2023).
Rogge, K. S. & Reichardt, K. Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: an extended concept and framework for analysis. Res Policy 45, 1620–1635 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bergek, A. & Berggren, C. The impact of environmental policy instruments on innovation: a review of energy and automotive industry studies. Ecol. Econ. 106, 112–123 (2014).
Google Scholar
Peñasco, C., Anadón, L. D. & Verdolini, E. Systematic review of the outcomes and trade-offs of ten types of decarbonization policy instruments. Nat. Clim. Chang 11, 257–265 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gallagher, K. S., Holdren, J. P. & Sagar, A. D. Energy-technology innovation. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 31, 193–237 (2006).
Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. B., Newell, R. G. & Stavins, R. N. Environmental policy and technological change. Environ. Resour. Econ. 22, 41–70 (2002).
Google Scholar
Neij, L. & Åstrand, K. Outcome indicators for the evaluation of energy policy instruments and technical change. Energy Policy 34, 2662–2676 (2006).
Google Scholar
Kern, F., Rogge, K. S. & Howlett, M. Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: new approaches and insights through bridging innovation and policy studies. Res. Policy 48, 103832 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bhardwaj, C., Axsen, J., Kern, F. & McCollum, D. Why have multiple climate policies for light-duty vehicles? Policy mix rationales, interactions and research gaps. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 135, 309–326 (2020).
Google Scholar
van den Bergh, J. et al. Designing an effective climate-policy mix: accounting for instrument synergy. Clim. Policy 21, 745–764 (2021).
Google Scholar
Silvia, C. & Krause, R. M. Assessing the impact of policy interventions on the adoption of plug-in electric vehicles: an agent-based model. Energy Policy 96, 105–118 (2016).
Google Scholar
Springel, K. Network externality and subsidy structure in two-sided markets: evidence from electric vehicle incentives. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 13, 393–432 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tran, M., Banister, D., Bishop, J. D. K. & McCulloch, M. D. Simulating early adoption of alternative fuel vehicles for sustainability. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 80, 865–875 (2013).
Google Scholar
Lepitzki, J. & Axsen, J. The role of a low carbon fuel standard in achieving long-term GHG reduction targets. Energy Policy 119, 423–440 (2018).
Google Scholar
Whistance, J., Thompson, W. & Meyer, S. Interactions between California’s low carbon fuel standard and the national renewable fuel standard. Energy Policy 101, 447–455 (2017).
Google Scholar
Bryngemark, E. & Söderholm, P. Green industrial policies and domestic production of biofuels: an econometric analysis of OECD countries. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 24, 225–261 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bento, A. M. & Klotz, R. Climate policy decisions require policy-based lifecycle analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 5379–5387 (2014).
Google Scholar
de Gorter, H. & Just, D. R. The economics of a blend mandate for biofuels. Am. J. Agric Econ. 91, 738–750 (2009).
Google Scholar
Breed, A. K., Speth, D. & Plötz, P. CO2 fleet regulation and the future market diffusion of zero-emission trucks in Europe. Energy Policy 159, 112640 (2021).
Chen, K., Zhao, F., Hao, H., Liu, Z. & Liu, X. Hierarchical optimization decision-making method to comply with china’s fuel consumption and new energy vehicle credit regulations. Sustainability 13, 7842 (2021).
Jenn, A., Azevedo, I. L. & Michalek, J. J. Alternative-fuel-vehicle policy interactions increase U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 124, 396–407 (2019).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. & Helfand, G. E. The Alternative Motor Fuels Act, alternative-fuel vehicles, and greenhouse gas emissions. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 43, 755–764 (2009).
Google Scholar
Ross Morrow, W., Gallagher, K. S., Collantes, G. & Lee, H. Analysis of policies to reduce oil consumption and greenhouse-gas emissions from the US transportation sector. Energy Policy 38, 1305–1320 (2010).
Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Zhao, F., Hao, H. & Liu, Z. Effect of chinese corporate average fuel consumption and new energy vehicle dual-credit regulation on passenger cars average fuel consumption analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res Public Health 18, 7218 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhao, F., Liu, F., Liu, Z. & Hao, H. The correlated impacts of fuel consumption improvements and vehicle electrification on vehicle greenhouse gas emissions in China. J. Clean. Prod. 207, 702–716 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wicki, M., Fesenfeld, L. & Bernauer, T. In search of politically feasible policy-packages for sustainable passenger transport: insights from choice experiments in China, Germany, and the USA. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 084048 (2019).
Google Scholar
Holzinger, K., Knill, C. & Sommerer, T. Is there convergence of national environmental policies? An analysis of policy outputs in 24 OECD countries. Environ. Polit. 20, 20–41 (2011).
Google Scholar
Berggren, C. & Magnusson, T. Reducing automotive emissions—the potentials of combustion engine technologies and the power of policy. Energy Policy 41, 636–643 (2012).
Google Scholar
Clerides, S. & Zachariadis, T. The effect of standards and fuel prices on automobile fuel economy: an international analysis. Energy Econ. 30, 2657–2672 (2008).
Google Scholar
Lee, J., Veloso, F. M., Hounshell, D. A. & Rubin, E. S. Forcing technological change: a case of automobile emissions control technology development in the US. Technovation 30, 249–264 (2010).
Google Scholar
Lee, J., Veloso, F. M. & Hounshell, D. A. Linking induced technological change, and environmental regulation: Evidence from patenting in the U.S. auto industry. Res. Policy 40, 1240–1252 (2011).
Google Scholar
Palage, K., Lundmark, R. & Söderholm, P. The impact of pilot and demonstration plants on innovation: the case of advanced biofuel patenting in the European Union. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 210, 42–55 (2019).
Google Scholar
Craglia, M. & Cullen, J. Do technical improvements lead to real efficiency gains? Disaggregating changes in transport energy intensity. Energy Policy 134, 110991 (2019).
Google Scholar
Reynaert, M. Abatement strategies and the cost of environmental regulation: emission standards on the European car market. Rev. Econ. Stud. 88, 454–488 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pierce, L. & Snyder, J. A. Discretion and manipulation by experts: evidence from a vehicle emissions policy change. B E J Econ. Anal. Policy 12, (2012).
Hu, K., Chopra, S. & Chen, Y. The effect of tightening standards on automakers’ non‐compliance. Prod. Oper. Manag. 30, 3094–3115 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ko, S. et al. NOx emissions from Euro 5 and Euro 6 heavy-duty diesel vehicles under real driving conditions. Energies 13, 218 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gerard, D. & Lave, L. B. Implementing technology-forcing policies: The 1970 Clean Air Act Amendments and the introduction of advanced automotive emissions controls in the United States. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 72, 761–778 (2005).
Google Scholar
Skeete, J.-P. Examining the role of policy design and policy interaction in EU automotive emissions performance gaps. Energy Policy 104, 373–381 (2017).
Leinert, S., Daly, H., Hyde, B. & Ó Gallachóir, B. Co-benefits? Not always: quantifying the negative effect of a CO2-reducing car taxation policy on NO emissions. Energy Policy 63, 1151–1159 (2013).
Google Scholar
Miravete, E. J., Moral, M. J. & Thurk, J. Fuel taxation, emissions policy, and competitive advantage in the diffusion of European diesel automobiles. Rand. J. Econ. 49, 504–540 (2018).
Dechezleprêtre, A., Neumayer, E. & Perkins, R. Environmental regulation and the cross-border diffusion of new technology: Evidence from automobile patents. Res. Policy 44, 244–257 (2015).
Google Scholar
Fu, M. & Andrew Kelly, J. Carbon related taxation policies for road transport: Efficacy of ownership and usage taxes, and the role of public transport and motorist cost perception on policy outcomes. Transp. Policy 22, 57–69 (2012).
Google Scholar
van Eck, G., de Jong, G., Wesseling, B. & van Meerkerk, J. Simulating the impact of tax incentives using a type choice model for lease cars. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 7, 814–822 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rhodes, E., Scott, W. A. & Jaccard, M. Designing flexible regulations to mitigate climate change: a cross-country comparative policy analysis. Energy Policy 156, 112419 (2021).
Yeh, S., Burtraw, D., Sterner, T. & Greene, D. Tradable performance standards in the transportation sector. Energy Econ 102, 105490 (2021).
Wang, Y. & Miao, Q. The impact of the corporate average fuel economy standards on technological changes in automobile fuel efficiency. Resour. Energy Econ. 63, 101211 (2021).
Zhou, N., Levine, M. D. & Price, L. Overview of current energy-efficiency policies in China. Energy Policy 38, 6439–6452 (2010).
Google Scholar
Wagner, D. V., An, F. & Wang, C. Structure and impacts of fuel economy standards for passenger cars in China. Energy Policy 37, 3803–3811 (2009).
Google Scholar
Cottes, J. Technological variation and the US renewable fuel standard. Technol. Anal. Strateg Manag 26, 385–399 (2014).
Google Scholar
Ito, K. & Sallee, J. M. The economics of attribute-based regulation: theory and evidence from fuel economy standards. Rev. Econ. Stat. 100, 319–336 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sen, B., Noori, M. & Tatari, O. Will Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standard help? Modeling CAFE’s impact on market share of electric vehicles. Energy Policy 109, 279–287 (2017).
Thorpe, S. G. Fuel economy standards, new vehicle sales, and average fuel efficiency. J. Regul. Econ. 11, 311–326 (1997).
Google Scholar
Ullman, D. F. A difficult road ahead: Fleet fuel economy, footprint-based CAFE compliance, and manufacturer incentives. Energy Econ. 57, 94–105 (2016).
Google Scholar
Whitefoot, K. S. & Skerlos, S. J. Design incentives to increase vehicle size created from the U.S. footprint-based fuel economy standards. Energy Policy 41, 402–411 (2012).
Google Scholar
Sallee, J. M. & Slemrod, J. Car notches: strategic automaker responses to fuel economy policy. J. Public Econ. 96, 981–999 (2012).
Google Scholar
Hao, H., Wang, S., Liu, Z. & Zhao, F. The impact of stepped fuel economy targets on automaker’s light-weighting strategy: The China case. Energy 94, 755–765 (2016).
Google Scholar
Tanaka, S. When tax incentives drive illicit behavior: the manipulation of fuel economy in the automobile industry. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 104, 102367 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sheehan-Connor, D. Environmental policy and vehicle safety: the impact of Gasoline Taxes. Econ. Inq. 53, 1606–1629 (2015).
Google Scholar
Sæther, S. R. Mobility at the crossroads – electric mobility policy and charging infrastructure lessons from across Europe. Transp. Res Part A Policy Pract. 157, 144–159 (2022).
Google Scholar
Egnér, F. & Trosvik, L. Electric vehicle adoption in Sweden and the impact of local policy instruments. Energy Policy 121, 584–596 (2018).
Google Scholar
Li, S., Tong, L., Xing, J. & Zhou, Y. The market for electric vehicles: indirect network effects and policy design. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 4, 89–133 (2017).
Huang, H., Khanna, M., Önal, H. & Chen, X. Stacking low carbon policies on the renewable fuels standard: Economic and greenhouse gas implications. Energy Policy 56, 5–15 (2013).
Google Scholar
Karmarkar-Deshmukh, R. & Pray, C. E. Private sector innovation in biofuels in the United States: induced by prices or policies? AgBioForum 12, 141–148 (2009).
Kessler, J., Sperling, D. & Tracking, U. S. biofuel innovation through patents. Energy Policy 98, 97–107 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ebadian, M., van Dyk, S., McMillan, J. D. & Saddler, J. Biofuels policies that have encouraged their production and use: an international perspective. Energy Policy 147, 111906 (2020).
Google Scholar
Meckling, J., Sterner, T. & Wagner, G. Policy sequencing toward decarbonization. Nat. Energy 2, 918–922 (2017).
Google Scholar
Stokes, L. C. & Breetz, H. L. Politics in the U.S. energy transition: case studies of solar, wind, biofuels and electric vehicles policy. Energy Policy 113, 76–86 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wesseling, J. H., Farla, J. C. M. & Hekkert, M. P. Exploring car manufacturers’ responses to technology-forcing regulation: The case of California’s ZEV mandate. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 16, 87–105 (2015).
Markard, J., Hekkert, M. & Jacobsson, S. The technological innovation systems framework: Response to six criticisms. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit 16, 76–86 (2015).
Google Scholar
Bohnsack, R., Kolk, A. & Pinkse, J. Catching recurring waves: low-emission vehicles, international policy developments and firm innovation strategies. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 98,71–87 (2015).
Nykvist, B. & Nilsson, M. Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles. Nat. Clim. Chang 5, 329–332 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ou, S. et al. The dual-credit policy: quantifying the policy impact on plug-in electric vehicle sales and industry profits in China. Energy Policy 121, 597–610 (2018).
Google Scholar
Inflation Reduction Act of 2023 (118th Congress, 1st session, Washington, D.C., 2023).
Lemphers, N., Bernstein, S., Hoffmann, M. & Wolfe, D. A. Rooted in place: regional innovation, assets, and the politics of electric vehicle leadership in California, Norway, and Québec. Energy Res Soc. Sci. 87, 102462 (2022).
Google Scholar
Collantes, G. & Sperling, D. The origin of California’s zero emission vehicle mandate. Transp. Res Part A Policy Pract. 42, 1302–1313 (2008).
Google Scholar
Döbbeling-Hildebrandt, N. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of ex-post evaluations on the effectiveness of carbon pricing. Nat. Commun. 15, 4147 (2024).
Google Scholar
Breetz, H. L. Do big goals lead to bad policy? How policy feedback explains the failure and success of cellulosic biofuel in the United States. Energy Res Soc. Sci. 69, 101755 (2020).
Google Scholar
Milovanoff, A., Posen, I. D. & MacLean, H. L. Electrification of light-duty vehicle fleet alone will not meet mitigation targets. Nat. Clim. Chang 10, 1102–1107 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sheldon, T. L. & Dua, R. Measuring the cost-effectiveness of electric vehicle subsidies. Energy Econ. 84, 104545 (2019).
Google Scholar
Weiss, M., Cloos, K. C. & Helmers, E. Energy efficiency trade-offs in small to large electric vehicles. Environ. Sci. Eur. 32, 46 (2020).
Google Scholar
Michalek, J. J. et al. Valuation of plug-in vehicle life-cycle air emissions and oil displacement benefits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108, 16554–16558 (2011).
Google Scholar
Harper, G. et al. Recycling lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles. Nature 575, 75–86 (2019).
Google Scholar
Harvey, L. D. D. Resource implications of alternative strategies for achieving zero greenhouse gas emissions from light-duty vehicles by 2060. Appl Energy 212, 663–679 (2018).
Google Scholar
Nordelöf, A., Messagie, M., Tillman, A.-M., Ljunggren Söderman, M. & Van Mierlo, J. Environmental impacts of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and battery electric vehicles—what can we learn from life cycle assessment? Int J. Life Cycle Assess. 19, 1866–1890 (2014).
Google Scholar
Leipprand, A., Flachsland, C. & Pahle, M. Starting low, reaching high? Sequencing in EU climate and energy policies. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit 37, 140–155 (2020).
Google Scholar
Harrison, R. M. et al. Non-exhaust vehicle emissions of particulate matter and VOC from road traffic: a review. Atmos. Environ. 262, 118592 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bonilla, D. & Foxon, T. Demand for New Car Fuel Economy in the UK, 1970-2005. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 43, 55–83 (2009).
Johnstone, N., Haščič, I. & Popp, D. Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: evidence based on patent counts. Environ. Resour. Econ. 45, 133–155 (2010).
Google Scholar
Rennings, K., Ludwig Brockmann, K. & Bergmann, H. Voluntary agreements in environmental protection: experiences in Germany and future perspectives. Bus. Strategy Environ. 6, 245–263 (1997).
Google Scholar
Sunnevåg, K. Voluntary agreements and the Incentives for innovation. Environ. Plan C Gov. Policy 18, 555–573 (2000).
Google Scholar
Wilson, C., Grubler, A., Gallagher, K. S. & Nemet, G. F. Marginalization of end-use technologies in energy innovation for climate protection. Nat. Clim. Chang 2, 780–788 (2012).
Google Scholar
Wilson, C. Input, output, and outcome metrics for assessing energy technology innovation. In Energy Technology Innovation 75–88 (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
Denyer, D., Tranfield, D. & van Aken, J. E. Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organ. Stud. 29, 393–413 (2008).
Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, D., Markard, J., Geels, F. W. & Fuenfschilling, L. Why carbon pricing is not sufficient to mitigate climate change—and how “sustainability transition policy” can help. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 117, 8664–8668 (2020).
Google Scholar
Nemet, G. F. How Solar Energy Became Cheap (Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge, 2019).
Ziegler, M. S. & Trancik, J. E. Re-examining rates of lithium-ion battery technology improvement and cost decline. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 1635–1651 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ziegler, M. S. & Trancik, J. E. Data series for lithium-ion battery technologies. (Harvard Dataverse, 2021).
link